Über den Einbruch in Server von Klimawissenschaftlern und die Bewertung dieses Einbruchs durch „Liberale” wurde hier schon berichtet. AP hat sich die Mühe gemacht, und die E‑Mails haarklein analysiert:
E‑mails stolen from climate scientists show they stonewalled skeptics and discussed hiding data — but the messages don’t support claims that the science of global warming was faked, according to an exhaustive review by The Associated Press.
The 1,073 e‑mails examined by the AP show that scientists harbored private doubts, however slight and fleeting, even as they told the world they were certain about climate change. However, the exchanges don’t undercut the vast body of evidence showing the world is warming because of man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
The scientists were keenly aware of how their work would be viewed and used, and, just like politicians, went to great pains to shape their message. Sometimes, they sounded more like schoolyard taunts than scientific tenets.
The scientists were so convinced by their own science and so driven by a cause „that unless you’re with them, you’re against them,” said Mark Frankel, director of scientific freedom, responsibility and law at the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He also reviewed the communications.
Frankel saw „no evidence of falsification or fabrication of data, although concerns could be raised about some instances of very ‚generous interpretations.’ ”
Some e‑mails expressed doubts about the quality of individual temperature records or why models and data didn’t quite match. Part of this is the normal give-and-take of research, but skeptics challenged how reliable certain data was.
The e‑mails were stolen from the computer network server of the climate research unit at the University of East Anglia in southeast England, an influential source of climate science, and were posted online last month. The university shut down the server and contacted the police.
The AP studied all the e‑mails for context, with five reporters reading and rereading them — about 1 million words in total.
Im Klartext: außer Spesen nichts gewesen, und der Klimawandel wird durch „ClimateGate” natürlich auch nicht widerlegt. Ich empfehle, den kompletten Artikel zu lesen.